Please Choose Your Country

Welcome. This website is intended solely for the use of institutional investors, consultants and other professionally recognized financial intermediaries in specific countries. Intech Investment Management LLC (“Intech”), is an investment adviser registered with the United States Securities & Exchange Commission. Intech is not permitted to offer products and services in all countries. It is the responsibility of prospective investors to inform themselves of and to observe all applicable laws and regulations of any relevant jurisdictions, including the legal requirements and tax consequences within the countries of their citizenship, residence, domicile and place of business with respect to the acquisition, holding or disposal of shares or securities, and any foreign exchange restrictions that may be relevant thereto. The products and services referred to in this website are not offered to any person or entity in any jurisdiction where the advertisement, offer or sale of such products and services is restricted or prohibited by law or regulation or where we would be subject to any registration or licensing requirement not currently held by Intech or our affiliates. If Intech does not offer a website for your country, please visit www.janushenderson.com.

For U.S. and Canadian Institutional Investors Only

Not your country? Please choose your country here.

Information contained in this area of the Website is published solely for general informative purposes and intended only for United States institutional investors, consultants, registered investment advisers (RIAs), financial advisers (FAs), and other financial intermediaries who are knowledgeable and experienced in the financial services market and investment products. If you are a retail or individual investor then please leave this website. The information is not authorized for use in a jurisdiction where distribution is not authorized and is not intended for distribution to individual retail clients. If you choose to access this Website from locations outside of the United States, you do so at your own initiative and risk, and are responsible for compliance with all applicable laws.

U.S. Institutional Investors: By accessing this site, you confirm that you are an U.S. institutional investor as set forth in one of the categories described above, agree not to forward or make the contents of this site available to any person who is not an U.S. institutional investor, and agree to be subject to intechinvestments.com terms of use.

Canadian Institutional Investors: By accessing this site you confirm that you are a “permitted client” as defined in National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations of the Canadian Securities Administrators, you agree not to forward or make the contents of this site available to any person who is not a “permitted client”, and you agree to be subject to intechinvestments.com terms of use. The information on this Website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute (i) an offer for products or services or (ii) the provision of investment advice of any kind, tailored or otherwise. The information on this Website should also not be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy to any persons who are prohibited from receiving such information under the laws applicable to their place of citizenship, domicile or residence. Intech Investment Management LLC (“Intech”) does not have any funds that offer securities under a simplified prospectus for general offer or sale within Canada. No securities regulatory authority in Canada has reviewed or in any way passed upon this website or the merits of any investment available, and any representation to the contrary is an offense. Intech is registered with the United States Securities & Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Intech is a subsidiary of Janus Henderson Group plc, and is affiliated with its subsidiaries and affiliates.


Decline - I am not an Institutional Investor

With some of the deepest equity drawdowns we’ve seen in years, investors are taking a serious look at low volatility equity strategies. After all, the diversification potential low vol provides to equity allocations extends meaningfully to the broader portfolio. Analyzing that potential, however, isn’t conventional.

Consultants Matter

We recommend using a consultant to evaluate institutional investment strategies, but that’s particularly true for assessing low volatility equity strategies given their variations in design and construction. Assembling a “clean” peer group of low volatility equity strategies to use for comparison purposes requires the expertise and experience consultants can provide.

Metrics Matter

Performance for low volatility strategies might look great in 2022, but these strategies are designed to deliver superior risk-adjusted returns over the long-term; therefore, performance results that include a full market cycle are essential for setting expectations across all market environments. Reducing these statistics to a single annualized figure for the entire period may work as a shorthand to summarize outcomes, but for many, rolling periods (e.g., one, three, or even five years) can help illuminate variations over time within those different environments.

Below is a list of performance measurements for assessing effectiveness and expectations for low volatility equity strategies. Here, we provide the measurements you might anticipate looking for on a standard factsheet, along with a few intriguing, less common metrics.

 

METRIC COMMON LESS COMMON
Volatility Historical (ex-post) Standard Deviation of Portfolio Returns
Frequently used to describe the strategy’s reduction in risk relative to a cap-weighted index.
Estimated, (ex-ante)
Holdings-Based Volatility

Allows you to examine a strategy’s position relative to the market at a specific point in time.
Beta

Historical (ex-post) Beta
May reveal persistent or dynamic defensive positioning relative to the market environment.

Predicted (ex-ante) Beta
Like estimated risk, designed to measure a strategy’s sensitivity to market moves at a particular moment.
Downside Risk Maximum Drawdown
A singular measurement of downside protection compared to the worst of the market.
Downside Deviation
Standard deviation of negative relative returns. Isolates downside or “bad” risk from the upside volatility that can drive returns.
Return Annualized Return and
Upside and Downside Capture

Establishes expectations for alpha, as well as asymmetry of returns in various risk regimes.
Mean and Difference Of Upside and Downside Capture Across Risk Regimes
The mean indicates a strategy’s defensiveness over a full market cycle, while the difference reflects how well a strategy maximizes the asymmetry of returns.
Efficiency Sharpe Ratio
A strategy’s return less the risk-free rate, divided by standard deviation. A Sharpe ratio higher than the benchmark should be a minimum requirement for any defensive equity strategy worth considering.
Sortino Ratio
A strategy’s return less the risk-free rate or minimum acceptable return, divided by downside deviation. Similar to Sharpe ratio, but penalizes for downside volatility.

Benchmarks Matter

Using a low volatility index as a benchmark for defensive equity strategies seems like it would make sense, but it’s less than straightforward under closer scrutiny. Major equity benchmark providers S&P Dow Jones, FTSE Russell, and MSCI all maintain rules-based low volatility equity portfolios they call indexes – but they shouldn’t be confused with their cap-weighted counterparts by any stretch of the imagination.

For one thing, which index approach is valid? It’s arbitrary to endorse one index over another given the wide range of construction methodologies. These so-called indexes are actually active strategies – they all have distinct stock selection processes, often have wide return dispersion, and some even lack transparency.

Even a cursory glance makes it quite obvious that unlike cap-weighted indexes, which generally feature similar construction methodologies, there’s a clear divergence in approaches here.

Index Construction Methodology Example* Parent Index Constraints Rebalancing Frequency
S&P Low Volatility Select least volatile stocks using trailing 12-month daily returns, weight in inverse proportion to volatility (least volatile = largest weights)   S&P 500 Specific number of constituents (e.g., 100 stocks for S&P 500 Low Volatility)   Quarterly
FTSE Minimum Volatility Optimize weights for lowest absolute volatility using a covariance matrix based on trailing two-year daily returns   FTSE All-World Individual stock, industry, and country   Semi-annually
MSCI Minimum Volatility Optimize weights for lowest absolute volatility using a covariance matrix based on proprietary Barra risk estimates   MSCI World Minimum and maximum constituents, individual stock, sector and/or country, common equity factors   Semi-annually

*Represents an example of a regional cap-weighted index from the same provider that the defensive equity index uses as its investment universe.

 

Instead, many low volatility equity investors simply use cap-weighted benchmarks and Sharpe ratio or Jensen’s (beta-adjusted) alpha to evaluate performance. Investors prefer Sharpe ratio if total volatility – both systemic and idiosyncratic risks – is most relevant. If only systemic risk is relevant, then Jensen’s alpha may be more appropriate. This practical approach recognizes that defensive equity investing isn’t about beating a defensive equity index; rather, it seeks a superior risk-return profile to cap-weighted benchmarks.

 

“…many low volatility equity investors simply use cap-weighted benchmarks and Sharpe ratio or Jensen’s (beta-adjusted) alpha to evaluate performance.”

 

Expectations Matter

Establishing realistic expectations for low volatility strategies is vital. Because markets have more up than down days, losing sight of the value these strategies seek to provide is easy. Having the conviction and discipline to hold low volatility strategies as important diversifiers through bull markets is hard. The fear of missing out, or FOMO, is real.

Painting an accurate picture of low volatility performance is challenging, however. Despite the substantial growth in low volatility assets over the last 10 years, live track records available for low volatility equity strategies are relatively short, and precious few include anything resembling an entire market cycle. Consequently, we attempt to provide a representation of low volatility performance using MSCI World Minimum Volatility Index with the following caveat: these returns are back-tested by MSCI since they begin on May 31, 1988, yet MSCI didn’t create this index until nearly 20 years later on April 14, 2008.1

 

MSCI World Minimum Vol Index vs MSCI World Index

Expertise Matters

Intech has been managing low vol portfolios for over a decade now. We offer a wealth of resources on the subject, including how to differentiate between low volatility equity strategies and their role in portfolio construction. Our recent paper, “Low Volatility Investing: Assess, Analyze, and Act” is a terrific primer on these topics.

Assess, Analyze, and Act on Low Volatility Investing  A Low Volatility Investing Primer Read More

 

1. The MSCI World Minimum Volatility (USD) Index was launched on April 14, 2008. Data prior to the launch date is back-tested test (i.e. calculations of how the index might have performed over that time period had the index existed). There are frequently material differences between back-tested performance and actual results. Past performance -- whether actual or back-tested -- is no indication or guarantee of future performance.

The information expressed herein is subject to change based on market and other conditions and is issued by Intech. The views presented are for general informational purposes only and are not intended as investment advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation, or sponsorship of any company, security, advisory service, or fund nor do they purport to address the financial objectives or specific investment needs of any individual reader, investor, or organization. This information should not be used as the sole basis for investment decisions. All content is presented by the date(s) published or indicated only, and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal and fluctuation of value. Indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly. Low volatility strategies are likely to underperform the index during periods of strong up markets and may not achieve the desired level of protection in down markets. Indices are not available for direct investment; therefore, performance does not reflect the expenses associated with the active management of an actual portfolio.

MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This material has not been approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI.