The Changing Landscape of Equity Market Drawdowns: Implications for Investors

Topics: , ,

Published on March 31, 2023

| 9 min read

Richard Yasenchak, CFA, Head of Client Portfolio Management

Seasoned investors know full well that periodic, significant declines are a natural part of both economic and equity market cycles. This is the price paid for equities’ attractive capital appreciation, and their place as a cornerstone asset class for long-term investors would seem to indicate most consider it a fair bargain. Asset allocators understand this risk and model their allocations accordingly.

But while capital market assumptions update regularly, the frequency, magnitude, and duration of equity market drawdowns are often embedded in the model. The past few years have seen several sharp drawdowns in rapid succession, prompting many institutional investors to contemplate a “regime change.” We definitely sympathize with this sentiment, but how different are drawdown risks? And if we’re in a new regime, what do we do about it?

Are Drawdowns More Frequent?

Using the S&P 500 as a proxy for equities here due to its long history, since the turn of the century we’ve seen both the two most severe drawdowns since 1950 (the tech bubble of 2000 and global financial crisis of 2008), and three of greater than 20% in the last five years alone (see Figure 1). The catalysts of the latter – trade war concerns, Covid-19, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine; an inflation hangover from three years of unprecedented stimulus; and subsequent monetary tightening and economic malaise – all might be considered exogenous shocks that investors largely did not see coming. Throw in another decline of more than 10% during the 2015-2016 sell-off and that’s four impactful drawdowns in less than two U.S. Presidential cycles. Compare that with 15 in the preceding 65 years, and they’ve been happening at more than double the rate (5 vs. 2.3 per decade).

S&P 500 INDEX DRAWDOWNS GREATER THAN 10%

Are Drawdowns More Dramatic?

Like the new teenagers in my household, drawdowns have brought a lot of drama with them recently. Since 2015, the duration of the drawdown cycles – from peak to trough and back – has been relatively short (see Figure 2).

TRADING DAYS TO MAX DRAWDOWN VS. RECOVERY TIME

While you might assume that large market declines tend to reach their nadir more quickly when that trough isn’t as severe, you might actually be surprised. The recent drawdowns gave us steep declines, and their rebounds were steep too, hence their short durations. Figure 3 shows the relationship between the maximum drawdown and how long the market took to get there.

MAX DRAWDOWN VS. TRADING DAYS TO DRAWDOWN TROUGH

On average, since 2015 these drawdowns of more than 10% have taken about 5.2 days per percentage point of max drawdown, whereas those in the previous period (1950-2014) took roughly 9 days (Figure 4). The recoveries are bouncing back faster too: 4.3 days per percentage point vs. 14 days in the earlier period (not including the present yet-to-be-recovered decline that began 2022). Of course, we also saw sharp moves in the 1990s but these may be better characterized as very brief corrections in an otherwise predominant bull market.

DRAWDOWN AND RECOVERY DAYS PER PERCENTAGE POINT

As we mentioned earlier, the first-order causes of this recent set since 2015 have been primarily external factors, rather than structural issues within financial assets, e.g., the dot-com bubble bursting coinciding with a slowing economy, and the 2008 global financial crisis. Both declines in the early part of this century took much longer to play out as various dominos continued to fall, and commensurately markets took several years to return to their previous highs.

A more prolonged trundle downward allows more time for investors to adapt to a change in regimes and protect their capital. Even active defensive equity strategies may find it challenging to optimize fast enough to handle these rapid shifts in the market environment. Or they may become more defensively positioned near the bottom, only to be caught on the wrong side of the market just as the market rebounds to benefit higher-beta stocks (as it did out of the Covid crisis in 2020).

While the other more recent declines in 2018 and 2020 were substantial but short-lived – the latter almost shockingly so in the face of the worst pandemic in a century – historically, drawdowns that imperil investor outcomes come in all shapes and sizes. The expiration date for today’s equity market uncertainty is yet-to-be-determined, ranging from a deep, recession to the kind of soft landing that would make Captain “Sully” Sullenberger proud.

For all their critical utility to investors, public equities in the short- to medium-term may be at the mercy of geopolitical uncertainty, refreshed concerns about the fragility of our banking system, and a Fed that seems determined to crush inflation with elevated interest rates at nearly any cost. Or it may be some other, yet unknown risk, like many before.

Today’s Equity Strategies Need Convexity and More

Significant equity drawdowns like those we’ve outlined here, whether they’re short-lived or long-lasting, contribute a significant source of risk to most portfolios and the potential for a devastating loss of capital. The typical investor response is to 1) change capital market assumptions, 2) make tactical portfolio changes, or 3) make strategic portfolio changes. These responses come with their own baggage, of course. What’s more, they may do little to navigate drawdowns, as asset class correlations often break down when they’re needed most.

Making asset allocation adjustments for any reason is a complex, time-consuming process, requiring collaboration and communication across investment teams, consultants, and trustees. Making frequent allocation adjustments in the face of drawdowns is simply impractical. Yet, most investors require significant equity allocations, and traditional equity strategies are ill-suited for markets that swiftly change opposite of your expectations.

In response to today’s challenges, Intech has developed an innovative equity strategy that seeks to anticipate market dislocations to provide convexity in market tail events, alpha across market regimes, and help stabilize the portfolio diversification investors intend.

This strategy is engineered to target:

  • Convexity in a market tail event
  • Reduced systemic risk exposure
  • Expected portfolio-level diversification
  • Higher risk-adjusted returns

We are excited to share this solution. Designed for today’s evolving equity markets and beyond, the strategy seeks to consistently outperform the capitalization-weighted equity market with less volatility while boosting performance during extreme short-term market moves.

If you’re interested in hearing about it, please don’t hesitate to reach out for more information.

Discover the Changing Landscape Download


This material is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation, or sponsorship of any company, security, advisory service, or fund nor does it purport to address the financial objectives or specific investment needs of any individual reader, investor, or organization. This material should not be used as the sole basis for investment decisions. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.

Nothing in this material shall be deemed to be a direct or indirect provision of investment management services specific to any client requirements. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general that should be considered before making any investment decision. All content is presented by the date(s) published or indicated only and may be superseded by subsequent market events or other reasons. No forecasts can be guaranteed and there is no guarantee that the information supplied is complete or timely, nor are there any warranties with regard to the results obtained from its use. Intech is the source of data unless otherwise indicated and has reasonable belief to rely on information and data sourced from third parties.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal and fluctuation of value. The value of an investment may go down as well as up and you may not get back what you originally invested. Nothing herein is intended to or should be construed as advice. 

There are inherent risks associated with investing in securities markets. Investing in securities involves risk of loss that investors should be prepared to bear. The risks will vary based on the nature and attributes of the investment strategy and the specific securities and other instruments held. Investing in futures is speculative, involves substantial risk, and is not suitable for all investors and is for designated institutional and professional investors, Qualified Purchasers, Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIB), Qualified Eligible Persons (QEP), Accredited Investors, and pension consultants who have the resources and financial expertise to understand the risks and limitations of such strategy.

An index is unmanaged, is not available for direct investment, and does not reflect the deduction of management fees or other expenses.

S&P 500 Dow Jones Indices LLC and/or its affiliates make no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any S&P data contained herein. The S&P data has been licensed for use by Intech and may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This presentation has not been approved, reviewed, or produced by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC. For more information on any of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC’s indices, please visit www.spdji.com.

In Australia, this information is issued by Intech Investment Management LLC (Intech) and is intended solely for the use of a wholesale clients as defined in section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and is not for general public distribution. Intech is permitted to provide certain financial services to wholesale clients pursuant to an exemption from the need to hold an Australian financial services licence under the Corporations Act 2001. Intech is regulated by the United States Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) under U.S. laws, which differ from Australian laws. By receiving this information, you represent that you are a wholesale client.

Intech is not permitted to offer products and services in all countries and not all products or services are available in all jurisdictions. This material or information contained in it may be restricted by law, may not be reproduced or referred to without express written permission or used in any jurisdiction or circumstance in which its use would be unlawful. Intech is not responsible for any unlawful distribution of this material to any third parties, in whole or in part. The contents of this material have not been approved or endorsed by any regulatory agency.